In addition to static data, anti-fraud systems analyze account behavior, specifically how an advertising campaign is created and managed. Sudden or illogical actions often trigger a review. For example, if a large budget is injected into the account immediately after registration or settings are suddenly changed, algorithms are triggered. We recommend avoiding intense activity in the first few days: any changes, whether budget increases, new campaigns, or profile edits, should be made gradually.
General legitimacy of behavior is also monitored. A real advertiser typically shows activity in the account, reviewing reports, gradually creating campaigns, linking verified contacts, and using a Google account with a history. If the account looks disposable — for example, an empty profile created solely to launch ads and immediately promoting prohibited content — the system will notice.
Google states that when determining violations, it takes data from various sources into account,
including consumer feedback. This indirectly indicates that the ad’s user-side performance, such as low experience ratings and complaints about the ad, can also have an impact. Additionally, Google monitors the history of violations: repeat offenses, such as an ad being rejected multiple times, may quickly lead to account suspension for
attempting to circumvent the rules.
Altogether, abnormal patterns, whether in timing (businesses typically aren’t active at night), speed of actions, or connections to other accounts, are all analyzed to detect fraudulent activity.